Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«lawrence» hmm. that's the way I've always understood it. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:53pm) «nate...» hrm..... *thinks* (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:53pm) «lawrence» the ones about "relationships" and stuff. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:53pm) «nate...» well, definitely lotr (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:53pm) «nate...» Where can you find a list of movies that came out in the last year? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:53pm) «lawrence» "Is this... what I want to know, is, is this a good date movie? And I'm inclined to say no..." oh wait. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:53pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» So something like Hedwig and the Angry Inch or Urbania is a "chick flick"?! (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:54pm) «lawrence» well, no. I'm trying to come up with examples, actually... (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:54pm) «nate...» michael: never heard of 'em. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:55pm) «nate...» I'm still trying to find a listing of movies released in 2002 so I can answer michael's question... (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:55pm) «jaye» *cracks up* can you imagine? someone wanting to take me to "how to lose a guy" on a date? idiot. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:55pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» But relationships are what those are all *about*. The pot can't hold itself. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:55pm) «John J. Ryan» Kath, I was watching a special on Chicago, and they said it was filmed in sound stages in Toronto in an industrial park. I wonder if that is the same industrial park where Mike Ford did his show? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:55pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Nate: Not suprised. They're all artsy and elitist. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:56pm) «nate...» hey now, when did I ever say I disliked artsy elitist movies? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:56pm) «nate...» answer: I didn't. :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:57pm) «John J. Ryan» Oh gawd, sorry about the change of subject... I get e-mails from my Beatle Band durmmed, Eric Paulin. Sometimes he signs his mails "E P". :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:58pm) «lawrence» haha (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:58pm) «John J. Ryan» drummer. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:58pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Hmm. Okay, so what movies should have been nominated that weren't Nate? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:59pm) «nate...» wow.... 7739 movies released in 2002?!? jesus (Mar 19, 2003 @ 2:59pm) «lawrence» whoa. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:00pm) «nate...» michael: that's what I'm currently trying to find a listing for. :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:00pm) «jaye» oh heavens. there's always things that should have gotten nominated but didn't. there are only five slots. we can start with best supporting actor. 1) dennis quaid. 2) andy serkis (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:00pm) «nate...» lawrence: yeah, check it out (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:00pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» that includes TV movies. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:02pm) «nate...» yeah, probably. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:02pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Jaci: Well, yeah, but I want to see what "non-artsy" films Nate thinks are going unheralded. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:03pm) «nate...» I'm having trouble finding movies released in 2002 that I've seen.... give me a sec here... (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:04pm) «jaye» oh. that's what the golden globes are for - they distinguish between drama and comedy, don't they? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:05pm) «jaye» of course, less than a hundred people vote for those (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:05pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Wait a second. The Golden Globes serve a purpose? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:06pm) «nate...» Hrm... looks like, so far, the only movie I've been able to find that was released in 2002 that I've seen is LOTR2 (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:06pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» try this list. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:06pm) «nate...» nope... two... XXX (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:06pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Hmmm... (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:07pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Well, clearly XXX deserved to be nominated for Best Picture. :-) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:07pm) «jaye» *snort* (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:07pm) «jaye» *ahem* sorry. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:08pm) «nate...» ahh.. panic room I saw, too... *continues reading* (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:08pm) «jaye» oh, that was this year? well. jodie should have been nominated. because she's hot. wasn't that one of the criteria earlier? :P (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:09pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» hehe. :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:09pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» :P (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:09pm) «nate...» Yeah, just those three. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:09pm) «nate...» so, out of those three... ummm....... LOTR deserves to win. :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:09pm) «jaye» actually, what i remember about that film was it had friggin cool opening credits. so if there was a category for that . . it could get nominated. catch me if you can should win, though (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:09pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Heh. Something tells me the Academy wouldn't take the recommendations of someone who went to three movies last year very seriously. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:10pm) «nate...» Why? :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:10pm) «nate...» I prefer to wait till they're on dvd.... unless they're worth seeing in the theater... (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:10pm) «jaye» yeah, and that's the thing. i don't know how many movies i saw last year, but during the film festival alone i went to 15 (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Jaci: Panic room? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «nate...» but... I'm sure I went to more than those three in the theatre this past year. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «jaye» in three weeks i saw five times the movies nate saw in a year :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» Catch me if you can had great opening credits. :) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «nate...» Hrm. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Yeah. I easily see 40 or 50 movies a year. More than that when I'm adequately medicated. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «jaye» michael - what about it? cool credits. that's all i remember (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «jaye» yeah. 50 easily. probably more (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:11pm) «jaye» fool of a jaci should keep track one of these years (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «nate...» Oh, I've probably seen around 50... just not in the theatre. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» I lose track of how many movies I've seen in theaters..over 20 or so. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» in a year. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «nate...» Too expensive and inconvenient. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Jaci: Just wasn't sure if that's the one you were referring to having cool credits. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «jaye» oh, yeah (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:12pm) «jaye» i'd just as soon see something in the theater. costs a buck more than a rental, and then i don't have to wait (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:13pm) «nate...» speaking of which, I need to update my netflix queue. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:13pm) «nate...» a buck more? damn, you must have cheap theatres. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:13pm) «jaye» netflix rocks (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:13pm) «nate...» around here it's around $9. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:13pm) «jaye» no, spendy rentals. a dvd is $4. a matinee/student/pass is $5 or $6 (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:14pm) «jaye» the film festival is $5. and half of those never make it to dvd . .in the states, anyway (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:14pm) «nate...» whereas rental (depending on how quickly I watch 'em) is $5 or less a movie (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:14pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» +They're just two totally different experiences. Going to the theater is an event. Watching a movie at home is...<shrug> pedestrian or something. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:14pm) «nate...» sometimes more like $1 each, if I go thru 'em fast. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:15pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» I was right...20. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:15pm) «jaye» yeah, in the theater i get out of the house, get to see lil (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:15pm) «nate...» well, thank you mr. elitist. ;) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:15pm) «jaye» you say elitist as if it's a bad thing :P (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:15pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Yeah, and that's another problem. An awful lot of the movies I really like never make it to DVD here. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:15pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» nate: you're welcome. :-) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «nate...» I like to wait till something's been in the theatre a few weeks or a month.. and by then the film is all scratchy and stuff. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» it's 10 bucks in Manhattan, I have to be more selective with my movie choices. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «nate...» I wouldn't go see something right when it opened... too crowded. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» and while I appreciate Cantonese subtitles as much as the next guy, somehow I think that Beautiful Thing could successfully be released to DVD in the states. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» I would depending on the movie. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «soul groove feline» does anybody know if it's illegal for poetry websites to show poems about abuse and erotica to minors, or if they just do it to be anal? (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:16pm) «soul groove feline» (just don't show them to be anal, i mean) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:17pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» sometimes, it's fun with the crowds. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:17pm) «nate...» it is NEVER fun with crowds... *imo* (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:17pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Yeah. Movies are pretty much $9.50 across the board, here in Chicago. But I can get that down to $6 if I buy passes and go after the first two weeks. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:17pm) «nate...» nate wants thursday. hates a movie theatre being more than half full... people talking... cell phones ringing... lines.... ugh. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:17pm) «jaye» yeah, it was fun going to chamber of secrets at midnight - everyone cheering for the ttt trailer and as each character came on screen. a little snark. good times. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:17pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Hee. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:18pm) «soul groove feline» i mean, if you're reading random poetry, and it says anything that even *hints* at those subjects, they bar you from reading it if it says in your profile that you're under 18 (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:18pm) «ChrisChin is Getting Old» Episode II was fun...lots of cheering when Yoda whipped out his lightsaber. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:18pm) «soul groove feline» (sorry, random ranting) (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:18pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» but that doesn't work at the Artsy Fartsy theaters. (Mar 19, 2003 @ 3:18pm) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2025 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|