Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«no one» like gella. whenever she reacts to me at all, its by trying to throttle me. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:20am) «iPauley» on the other hand, I try not to say too much to quickly, in any event -- I think I must not like hearing that I'm wrong, so I try to make sure I'm right before saying something.... which means I take too long to compose and then the moment is gone... (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:22am) «no one» hey, hearing that one is wrong is unpleasant, but understanding why is a revelation. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:25am) «no one» i just love it whenever someone convinces me of the error of my ways, and it happens often enough. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:27am) «iPauley» 'sprobably a factor in why I get along so well with those I meet initially online -- an immediate response is not necessary, I have a few seconds to "compose" something to say back. I don't have much of an conversation autopilot, as it were (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:28am) «no one» you're doing alright then. don't be afraid to get in someone's face. if you get shot down, you will have learnt something, you will have developed. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:30am) «iPauley» I feel more comfortable when I have something to back me up -- I don't usually have it in me to "get in someone's face" if I'm not damn sure that I'm right. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:32am) «no one» test your opinions and be glad for every time you convinced that you are right. be equally glad if someone convinces you that you were wrong. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:35am) «no one» oops, words missing in the above:test your opinions and be glad for every time you convinced someone else that you are right. be equally glad if someone convinces you that you were wrong. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:38am) «iPauley» ahhh, that makes a little more sense. :-P alas, I must head off to bed now. Until next time... (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:39am) «no one» rest well (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:39am) «no one» hi michael (Jan 29, 2003 @ 2:48am) «Rhi: so confused» morning, wall (Jan 29, 2003 @ 7:21am) «no one» shhhh! (Jan 29, 2003 @ 7:44am) «no one» wake it gently. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 7:44am) «nate...» oy (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:03am) «emilie is CRANKY» oi oi, saveloy ;) (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:06am) «nate...» saveloy? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:19am) «no one» snag (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:21am) «A girl named Becca» oO pease pudding and saveloys... "what next?" is the question...Oo (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:26am) «A girl named Becca» oO rich gentlemen have it, boys: in-di-gestion! Oo (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:26am) «nate...» umm... k. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:28am) «A girl named Becca» oO food, glorious food...Oo (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:29am) «no one» don't know what next, but the answer is unlikely to be 42. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:29am) «no one» on the grounds that it would be a backward step. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:31am) «no one» but then, thats where life, the universe and everything is heading. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:32am) «nate...» eh, doesn't much matter, since monkeyprez is going to get us all killed in a matter of weeks. :P (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:33am) «no one» no no no (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:33am) «no one» its going to be a bit worse than that. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:33am) «no one» not with a bang but a whimper (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:34am) «no one» first, the price for a barrel of crude oil will triple within three months (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:34am) «no one» inflation will consequently skyrocket (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:35am) «no one» people got no money to spare other than on food. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:37am) «no one» so, production of nonessential items will cease. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:37am) «no one» leading to massive unemployment. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:38am) «no one» and consumerist civilization, as we know it, will collapse (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:39am) «no one» no cds, no movies, no polls on favourite green herbs. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:40am) «no one» the end :) (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:40am) «nate...» hehe (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:44am) «nate...» and, you had an extranious "u" in "favorite". ;) (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:44am) «no one» i spelled it in english, not american (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:45am) «no one» another example of two nations divided by a common language (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:45am) «Misch» Oh yeah, you'll have to learn these things if you want to live in Canada, nate. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:47am) «Misch» Cheque, flavour... (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:47am) «Misch» "Do you play hockey" comes out as "Play hockey, eh?" (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:47am) «no one» theatre (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:47am) «Misch» "About" AH-boot. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:48am) «Misch» "Sorry" "soorey" (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:48am) «no one» good neight (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:48am) «nate...» well, I do spell it theatre... (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:48am) «nate...» but.. I refuse to add extra letters... it's just bloat. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:49am) «Misch» As it should be spelled. But, please, go see movies at the cinema. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:49am) «no one» mooviees? are you referring to moving pictures? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:50am) «no one» i prefer just listening to the wireless. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:51am) «no one» especially while operating my horseless carriage, in these modern times referred to as automobile. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 8:55am) «no one» from the end of civilisation and the us of a to spelling in one step; only on fhdc! (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:00am) «Misch» Fake news leads to rebuttal, leads to... (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:11am) «Misch» this (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:11am) «Misch» And with that, I am off. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:11am) «no one» come back, paul, and tell me who the olsen twins are! (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:22am) «no one» come back, paul, and tell me who the olsen twins are! (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:23am) «no one» oops again again (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:24am) «nate...» I can't open the first link... the original spoof... (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:33am) «no one» neither can i. it remains blank, including the address line (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:33am) «nate...» and, stefan: the olsen twins are these twins who were on an awful tv sitcom as little kids... and have since grown up to be really hot. Prompting many males to be anxiously awaiting their entrance (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:34am) «nate...» into the realm of legality, so they can lust after them with a clear conscience. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:34am) «nate...» such as this site (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:34am) «no one» ah, thanks. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:34am) «no one» do i really want to inquire further? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:35am) «nate...» well, that site is pretty funny.. with the running to-the-second coundown timer. :D (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:36am) «no one» ok, i'll have a look (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:36am) «no one» lots of mascara (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:39am) «no one» the hair stylist and lighting engineer must have cost almost as much. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:41am) «nate...» indeed. they always wear too damned much makeup.. but that's the style these days, unfortunately. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:42am) «nate...» they actually are kinda cute without it. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:42am) «no one» these days? ever heard of lucille ball? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:43am) «no one» yes, right (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:44am) «no one» another win of marketing over product (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:44am) «nate...» yeah, but I'm talking with teenage girls and such.... in recent years there has been this "racoon trend". (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:46am) «no one» lol (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:47am) «no one» is "legal age" in the us 18? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:51am) «nate...» well, it really depends on the state.... actually, most states it's 17. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:51am) «no one» o bother ... the land of freedom an prudity. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:52am) «no one» in australia it's 16, and yet, the rampaging hormones of puberty would have got a lot of us into trouble with the law if we'd been caught out before we got to that age. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 9:58am) «nate...» well, it's only someone of age and somone NOT of age that's an issue. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:04am) «nate...» I mean, when I was 16 it was perfectly fine to be with my 16 year old girlfriend. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:04am) «no one» i see, yet the olen twins' managers feel totally at ease marketing their product as sex objects,and its legal? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:07am) «no one» worse, i managed 3 typos in one line. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:07am) «nate...» Oh yeah.... they've been marketed as such for years.. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:09am) «no one» prudity is the handmaiden for lechery (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:10am) «no one» eek, its after 2. i got to get up at 5. cya. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:11am) «nate...» Sure I missed you at this point... but.. sleep well. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:28am) «Michael (foof) Maki» Well, I can see right now that nights with enough sleep are a thing of the past until I get done with Kingdom Hearts (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:29am) «nate...» I can see clearly now the rain is gone. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:48am) «Michael (foof) Maki» Heh. Heya, Nate. How you doing? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:49am) «nate...» alright... but kinda tired, and feeling icky (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:49am) «nate...» no, strike that.... VERY tired. (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:49am) «nate...» you? (Jan 29, 2003 @ 10:49am) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2025 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|