Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«Joy- new picture!» *sniffle* (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:26pm) «goovie is married!» revenge? (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:28pm) «Gordondon son of Ethelred» Farewell fair wallers wherever you fare (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:28pm) «Joy- new picture!» the new Stephen Fry book. A suspense novel, so I've heard. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:28pm) «Joy- new picture!» bye, Gordon! *hugs* (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:29pm) «goovie is married!» bye gordondon. have fun with madeline peyroux :) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:29pm) «Joy- new picture!» also... why zeppo? (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:29pm) «goovie is married!» oh yeah. i haven't read it...i haven't enjoyed his books as much as i've wanted to. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:29pm) «goovie is married!» buffy reference. going along with my whiny entries from the last two days. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:30pm) «Joy- new picture!» ok. I didn't know if I should jump on the Marx Brothers theme. ;) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:30pm) «Misch» /me looks through the Staples catalog... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:34pm) «Misch» hmm... what is the department going to get me as a go away present... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:34pm) «Joy- new picture!» heh heh heh... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:38pm) «jaye» heh. that's something that i don't have to wonder about ;) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:39pm) «goovie is married!» yeah, same here. i don't think they'd notice if i left right now. :P (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:40pm) «jaye» /me has been encouraged to quit (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:42pm) «goovie is married!» gak. really? (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:43pm) «Joy- new picture!» encouraged? (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:43pm) «jaye» yeah, i was . .um ..reminded that this is an "at will" position, and if i was having personal issues i could feel free to turn in my resignation (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:45pm) «jaye» (my personal issues were a few days of haggling with the university on my breaks and lunch) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:45pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» OMG. What a totally presposterous statement. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:45pm) «goovie is married!» grr. bastards. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:45pm) «jaye» /me is starting a complaint to employee relations. *rawr* (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:46pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Remind him or her that the "at will" street runs both ways, and they should feel free to fire you if they don't want you around. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:46pm) «Joy- new picture!» grrrrrrrrrrrrr. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:46pm) «jaye» oh, she doesn't have a problem with that. she threatened to fire me if she caught me online during work hours (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:47pm) «Joy- new picture!» *blink* (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:47pm) «jaye» (and we see -exactly- how much that concerned me :P ) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:47pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» bitch. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:50pm) «jaye» well, i try ;) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:51pm) «nate...» yeah, a lot of offices are like that now. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:51pm) «nate...» our people get written up for browsing/emailing during or after calls... they can only do it on break or if there are no calls coming in. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:52pm) «nate...» but, we're in a bit of a different situation.. being a call center. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:52pm) «jaye» oh, i understand that policy. but the situation here is a little more complicated. i actually do have a case for ee relations - the internet is a side issue (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:54pm) «nate...» *nods* (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:54pm) «goovie is married!» at poetry.com we didn't even have net access. so it's still working here and being apparently free to do whatever i want online. :P (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:54pm) «nate...» heh (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:55pm) «nate...» poetry like a monkey (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:55pm) «goovie is married!» poetry like a monkey pirate with cheese. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:56pm) «nate...» mmm.... cheese. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:57pm) «goovie is married!» pirates eat bananas/they used to eat monkeys/but now they don't (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:58pm) «nate...» mmmmmmm... pirates..... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 3:59pm) «Joy- new picture!» ugh. i know i should go work. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:01pm) «Kevin - King of WiFi» i wrote a poem (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:01pm) «Kevin - King of WiFi» the street sign is a bird (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:01pm) «Kevin - King of WiFi» the sun is a flowerpot (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:02pm) «Kevin - King of WiFi» and we are all just pirate monkeys (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:02pm) «Joy- new picture!» hmm. I have a question with the thumbs up/thumbs down business. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:03pm) «Joy- new picture!» I must have been thumbs downed at some point, but I don't know when. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:03pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Hey, Kevin! (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:07pm) «nate...» yeah, is there a way to search for what things you got thumbs-downed on? (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:17pm) «Joy- new picture!» hi, kevin! (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:17pm) «nate...» heya kevin (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:17pm) «lawrence» not that I know of. there was, very briefly, a way to see who had thumbed up and down specific posts. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:17pm) «nate...» *nods* I saw that... it went away, tho (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:18pm) «lawrence» yeah, probably a good thing, too. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:18pm) «nate...» well, I just put in my $.02 on the subject. :) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:18pm) «lawrence» people would probably be even *more* hesitant to use if if they knew the people could see they gave a thumbs down (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:18pm) «nate...» lawrence: i disagree... if you're going to be thumbing someone down, you should be held responsible and have a good reason. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:19pm) «Joy- new picture!» I think it would be helpful to see where you were thumbed down, though. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:19pm) «lawrence» well, there's a number by each rating that indicates how many people have rated it. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:19pm) «lawrence» sometimes it's possible to guess which way it went (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:19pm) «nate...» but not how they rated it... or why... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:19pm) «Joy- new picture!» I've never done the internet posting thing other than FHDC, so it would be nice to know what's bad... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:19pm) «lawrence» well, I think the things that are most likely to get thumbed down (or should, IMO) are pointless posts - i.e. "first post" and such. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:20pm) «lawrence» and things that should get thumbed up are those that are *especially* useful or interesting. everything else should probably just be left alone. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:20pm) «nate...» okay.. explain.. what is this "first post" thing? (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:20pm) «lawrence» (also, thumbs down should probably apply to things that would have violated the acceptable use policy on the old FHDC) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:20pm) «lawrence» on some message boards (particularly slashdot) a lot of people think it makes them cool to be the first person to post in a thread. so they post *just* "first post" (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:21pm) «nate...» ahh.... yeah, that's annoying. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «lawrence» yeah. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «lawrence» fark.com handles it nicely. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «nate...» but see, again.... i don't see any need for the whole moderation thing here... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «lawrence» if the words "first post" appear anywhere in your message, they are replaced with "boobies" and the time one the message is set to 12 hours in the future. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «nate...» but if you're GOING to have it.. and you're GOING to rate someone down... (or up)... your name should be attached to it.. and you should be asked to provide a reason. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «Misch» f1457 p057!!!! (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:22pm) «lawrence» hmmm, that's a good idea, nate. although if you wanted to be a dick, you could *still* just thumb someone down and say "hate you." :) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:23pm) «nate...» true, but I don't see that happening here. :) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:23pm) «nate...» and... let me suggest that in the discussion. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:23pm) «lawrence» I don't share your optimism on that one, Nate. first hand experience and all. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:24pm) «Misch» so, if me nate or lawrence say (-1, Stupidity), that's usually what we're talking about. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:24pm) «goovie is married!» "reason: you smell funny." (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:24pm) «lawrence» most of the reasons I would thumb someone down would be things like "unacceptable behaviour" (AUP stuff) or "pointless post that just takes up space." (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:25pm) «lawrence» I think the biggest thing that seems to have *not* been explained is the agreement/disagreement thing. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:25pm) «lawrence» 'cause clearly a LOT of people thought it was supposed to be that (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:26pm) «lawrence» and I agree with... I think it was Joy who posted this - that if we *do* keep some sort of moderation system, it should be clearly explained and everyone should start with a clean slate. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:26pm) «nate...» yeah, I agree with that too. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:28pm) «nate...» and we should each get a pony. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:29pm) «nate...» and roller skates (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:29pm) «jaye» the biggest thing? was -any- of it explained? (that sounds harsher than i meant it. it's just a question) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:30pm) «lawrence» and one milllllllion dollars. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:30pm) «nate...» heh... jaci: no. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:31pm) «nate...» it was an experiment.... (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:31pm) «lawrence» hrm. good point. I think it just... appeared. :) (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:31pm) «goovie is married!» and a waterbuffalo! (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:32pm) «nate...» a wuffalo! (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:32pm) «goovie is married!» yeah. i figured it was something everyone was familiar with but me. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:32pm) «nate...» well, it's a thing that geeks are familiar with... through /. (Aug 14, 2002 @ 4:33pm) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2024 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|