Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«meh» *uncontrolable laughter* (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:00pm) «meh» his wife must fake it _everytime_ (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:00pm) «meh» or girlfriends...or whatever (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:01pm) «meh» *still laughing* (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:01pm) «meh» wow (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:01pm) «nate...» at the same time, though. everyone's different. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:02pm) «nate...» I've known some women who could ONLY get off that way.. *shrugs* (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:02pm) «nate...» granted, only two.... but still. :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:03pm) «meh» yeah (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:03pm) «meh» and they were faking... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:03pm) «nate...» *shrugs* it wasn't me doing it with them... so I doubt they were lying about it. :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:03pm) «meh» there are differnent types as well...some not as intense as others....the big "o" from missionary only, i will say with 99.9% of all women, will not happen. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:04pm) «nate...» then my one friend deb... she could only get one from being on top.... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:05pm) «nate...» tiph: yeah, granted. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:05pm) «nate...» but as I said, everyone's different...... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:05pm) «nate...» (and, I would tend to disagree on your 99.9% comment.....) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:06pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Well, I'll bow out as my experience in this arena is decidedly limited. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:06pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» But Dr. Drew and Adam *do not* agree with Nate. :-) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:07pm) «nate...» in what way, michael? (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:07pm) «meh» this is true. everyone is different. i'm just speaking on a general level. there are exceptions...though few and far betweeen. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:07pm) «nate...» I only speak from what I've been told by friends... etc..... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:07pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Dr Drew states that some miniscule number of women get an orgasm from intercourse at all. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:07pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» You haven't done in-depth studies, Nate? I'm shocked. ;-) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:08pm) «nate...» michael: this is true..... but only because the majority of the human population do not have a healthy sexual attitude. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:08pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» and that jives with the talks I've had with my straight female friends. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:09pm) «nate...» wellllll.....tiph... while you have the equipment to experiment with more than I do....... I would hazard to guess I've discussed it with a similar number of people. :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:09pm) «meh» it's okay for you to disagree. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:10pm) «nate...» I'm not disagreeing.. I'm just saying, keep an open mind.... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:10pm) «nate...» I can't comment on it any more or less than you can. :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:10pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» nate: Really? I'd think it's more about the plunbing involved. There are certain key organs which are just not stimulated by intercourse (in particular in man-on-top missionary position) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:11pm) «nate...» michael: yes, but they CAN be stimulated in that position... :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:11pm) «meh» the general consensus with my female friends have been pretty much what i have stated. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:11pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Well, yeah, but that ruins the whole "only by intercourse" part. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:12pm) «nate...» ahh... welllll... nothing is ONLY intercourse.... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:12pm) «nate...» I thought we were talking position. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:12pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Good point. Heh. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:12pm) «meh» nate and michael: yes, it can be stimulated in that position. but to state that the position is the most effective is ridiculous. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:12pm) «nate...» but, again, it depends on the person. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:13pm) «nate...» though I would agree... to the general populus.... that is not the best position. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:13pm) «meh» so that guy...whatever his name is...needs to do his homework before making such a statement. =) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:13pm) «meh» but it does provide material for debates... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:14pm) «nate...» right, but it's still equally narrow-minded of you to say that that position is, absolutely, NOT the best for anyone. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:14pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Yeah, I would imagine that digital stimulation would make the percentage rise significantly. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:15pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Well, see the thing is that this guy proved himself to be a total idiot for *many* other reasons... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:15pm) «nate...» where was this, again? (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:16pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Goodness. I didn't really intend for the wall to be taken over with sex-chatter. :-/ (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:16pm) «nate...» *laughs* (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:17pm) «nate...» yes, well, perhaps we should head back towards "family wall" territory. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:17pm) «nate...» :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:17pm) «nate...» if anyone wants to continue discussion... we should start an aim chat. :) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:18pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Nate: The Straight Dope Message Board. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:18pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» what's yer name on AIM? (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:18pm) «nate...» andreas8088 (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:18pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Hmmm...I think I knew that at one time... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:19pm) «nate...» it's possible... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:19pm) «nate...» I think it's in my profile... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:19pm) «nate...» yes, it is. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:20pm) «nate...» /me yawns (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:21pm) «nate...» god, this week was hell. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:21pm) «nate...» time for stupid customer quote time? I think so!!! (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:21pm) «nate...» "I don't understand how you people can be so gung-ho about getting someone connected, but when we go to disconnect your service, you don't have the same priority!!" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:22pm) «meh» o0o0o0...stoopid customer quote!!! so many to choose from. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:22pm) «nate...» "I don't understand why you gotta be raisin up and down da bill... like, you eider gotta give a person a bill.. or not... but don't be, like, raisin it up and down!" (this was due to their LD usage) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:23pm) «Erica: movin' to Ohio!!» heh (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:23pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» heh. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:23pm) «nate...» "yeah, I got one of them computers... it's like, in a suitcase?" "a laptop?" "Yeah... that's it." (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:23pm) «nate...» *thinks about who else he talked to today....* (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:24pm) «Erica: movin' to Ohio!!» fridays are excellent (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:24pm) «nate...» "I want someone back out here BEFORE 4:00!!!!" "Ma'am.. I understand your frustration.. I really do... however, it's currently 4:15". "*I* *DON"T* GIVE A SH*T!!!!" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:25pm) «nate...» yeah, we get 'em all on fridays. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:25pm) «nate...» :P (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:25pm) «meh» "your service is crap because i couldn't use my computer during the power outage." someone in texus to a friend of mine that works at earthlink. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:26pm) «nate...» heh (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:26pm) «Erica: movin' to Ohio!!» heh, again (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:26pm) «meh» texas...i can't spell...hee hee (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:26pm) «nate...» oh!!!! I'm not sure if ya'll are aware... but there was that big Tyson vs. Lewis fight on PPV a little while ago.... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:26pm) «meh» nate:wow...sounds like fun (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:27pm) «nate...» I got, and I'm NOT kidding..... at least 3 customers a day who wanted credit because they couldn't ORDER it.... (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:27pm) «jaye» hell, i'm still amused that the manager asked "what does 'processed in the future' mean?" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:27pm) «nate...» "I deserve credit for this!" "But.... sir... you didn't pay for the pay per view...." "I know!!! BUT I WANTED IT!!!!" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:27pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» wanted credit because they couldn't order it? Huh? (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:28pm) «nate...» yeah, exactly. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:28pm) «Erica: movin' to Ohio!!» oh man, that's stressful (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:28pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» People Are Assholes. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:29pm) «nate...» oh, and my personal favorite...(and this isn't an exact quote... it's a generalized one based on about 100 or so customers...) " My cable modem has been out for two days now!!!! I'm trying to run a business here!!!" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:29pm) «nate...» "Sir, I understand... but this is a residential product.... it's not for business use..." (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:29pm) «nate...» "Do you know how much money I make???? I make (insert between $60 and $2000 here) an hour!!!!! I doubt YOU make that much!!!!" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:30pm) «nate...» "Sir, my pay is none of your business, but might I suggest, if you have that much money at your disposal, that you have a redundant internet connection?" (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:30pm) «nate...» (insert string of profanities) (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «meh» sheesh (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» heh. So let me transfer you to our business division. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «nate...» yeah, right? (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «nate...» hehehe (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «meh» heard that. there are all kinds of idiots out there. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» They'll be more than happy to take some of that money you have piling up around the house off your hands. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «nate...» my dad's a day trader... he has not one, not two, not three, but four internet connections. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:31pm) «nate...» cable, two dialup... and satellite. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:32pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» wow. (Aug 9, 2002 @ 7:32pm) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2024 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|