Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«Shawna login infrequent» Cuz otherwise tired fruheads start spelling "go" as "got" (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Kate Leahy» paul -- right. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Melinda J. Beasi» i DO vote, and i strongly believe in it, and treasure my right to vote. but i would move somewhere else if it became against the law not to vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Kate Leahy» hence our dismal voter turnout. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «I can see the bunny» actually, the basis of criminal justice comes from ancient Greece - but what we have today bears little similarity to how it started off... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Melinda J. Beasi» it is as much of a stand to abstain as it is to vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Shawna login infrequent» One insomniac night, I was watching Leno (ugh) and they were asking some random woman if she could identify the photos of some major American politicans... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Paul D. Beasi» if i were forced to vote, i would be forced to show my support for a candidate i did not believe in. or more likely, i'd be voting against the candidate i (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Paul D. Beasi» believed LESS in (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Melinda J. Beasi» chrissy, i don't care if my morality often coincides with biblical law. the simple truth is that i would never believe in something just BECAUSE it was (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Melinda J. Beasi» biblical law. i would believe in it if i thought i was right. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Shawna login infrequent» ...she couldn't even indentify Bush. When asked: "Don't you VOTE?" She replied "Oh...I don't know...*fluster fluster* My husband does everything....I dunno..." (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Kate Leahy» well, in belgium it's illegal to not check in at the polls. you don't have to cast a vote for any particular party or individual, for instnace. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Melinda J. Beasi» what do i care if the bible and i agree here and there? it's not relevent. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Kate Leahy» the whole issue of biblical law is a little too hot to handle. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Paul D. Beasi» ah, but they aren't forcing you to vote, just to show up. it would be inconvenient, but i wouldn't say i was opposed to that (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Paul D. Beasi» i'd go and then not vote (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Kate Leahy» "thou shalt not murder" only comes one book after a law that says you can kill your daughter for being promiscuous (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Melinda J. Beasi» why? i am not AGAINST the bible, i just simply have no interest in it. what do i care if i agree with it sometimes and sometimes don't? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Kate Leahy» yes. i'm using the term "vote" too loosely, i think. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:34am) «I can see the bunny» /me will refrain from giving opinions on the bible....being a recovered Baptist and all... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:34am) «Paul D. Beasi» agreed, melinda. i don't believe in killing. my support for being anti-kill does not mean i support the bible, since it says "thou shalt not kill" and that's (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Melinda J. Beasi» the whole issue of biblical law has no relevance to people who don't believe in the bible. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Paul D. Beasi» where the law is based. I (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Melinda J. Beasi» if they were doing a "go, bible!" show, actually i probably would not go. because though i have no strong opinion against it as a lovely work of fiction, i als (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Melinda J. Beasi» also have no desire to support it in such a complete way. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Paul D. Beasi» i'm TOTALLY missing your point, chrissy (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «bored, bored, bored....» Melinda - I agree. If I had to go to court, I wouldn't swear on the bible, because it would have no meaning whatsoever for me (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Melinda J. Beasi» so, no, i would not give my money to the bible (if you can give your money to an inanimate object). (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Melinda J. Beasi» lisa, i would not either. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Paul D. Beasi» if fruvous WERE doing a "go bible" show, i'd at least show up to see that it was actually happening :) but no, i would not attend (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:37am) «Paul D. Beasi» even if it were billed as "their last show ever! really! we mean it!" (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:37am) «Kate Leahy» i don't believe it's required to do the bible thing in court. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:37am) «bored, bored, bored....» I'm sure they let you take a different oath. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Melinda J. Beasi» there is no need to explain. quakers (which i was brought up as) can affirm rather than swear on the bible. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Paul D. Beasi» No, i am not. Laws can be based on anything. I can agree with them and I can disagree with them. Agreeing with a law that has a basis in something that i (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Kate Leahy» i always thought it was a little weird anyway. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Paul D. Beasi» don't believe in 100% means nothing. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Melinda J. Beasi» and i'm sure anyone could. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Melinda J. Beasi» how so? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Kate Leahy» just curiosity (really) -- do you follow laws with which you agree? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Kate Leahy» er, with which you disagree, rather (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:39am) «Paul D. Beasi» hmmm.. trying to think... i know i've broken laws that i agree with (and yes, i am a hypocrite for it) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:40am) «Paul D. Beasi» i'm trying to come up with an example of a law i disagree with but follow anyway (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:40am) «bored, bored, bored....» Is anyone else now earwormed with "Entropy"? ;-) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:41am) «soul groove feline» i am ;-) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:41am) «I can see the bunny» lol (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:42am) «Paul D. Beasi» my wife just came up with one (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:42am) «Kate Leahy» i think the closest thing is speed limits. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:42am) «Paul D. Beasi» in Massachusetts, you are required to be tested for syphilis. if you fail, you are not allowed to get marred (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:43am) «Kate Leahy» actually, i have it backward. i break it and agree with it. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:43am) «Kate Leahy» hrm. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:43am) «Melinda J. Beasi» (marred=married) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:43am) «Paul D. Beasi» no test for AIDS, herpes, gonorrhea. just syphilis. i didn't agree with the law (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:43am) «Paul D. Beasi» but i had to follow it to get married. so yes, i decided that being married was more important than my stance. which, YES, makes me a hypocrite (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:44am) «Kate Leahy» that's probably super-antiquated. do they actually enforce it? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:44am) «Paul D. Beasi» hmmm.. actually i disagree with the speed limits and break them all the time :) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:44am) «Melinda J. Beasi» yes, they do- you have to have the blood test results to get the marriage liscense. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:44am) «Paul D. Beasi» yes. no blood test, no license. no license, no marraige (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:44am) «Kate Leahy» in greece, anyone entering the country with a visa that lists "artist" as a profession is required to be tested for AIDS. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:45am) «Melinda J. Beasi» license. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:45am) «Paul D. Beasi» actually in texas, you can be arrested for any traffic violation (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:45am) «Kate Leahy» chrissy -- they count as traffic laws, i think. but i don't start law school 'til *next* fall, so don't quote me :). (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:45am) «Paul D. Beasi» at least in some counties. i don't know if it's state or local where that's decided (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:45am) «Melinda J. Beasi» there were upsides to getting married here. we got to have a canadian college student solomnize the marriage. :) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:45am) «Melinda J. Beasi» seemed like a pretty good trade-off. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:46am) «Kate Leahy» in texas you can probably be executed for traffic violations. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:46am) «Paul D. Beasi» yes... give me a minute to search CNN and i can find proof. there was a big brouhaha over that awhile back. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:46am) «Paul D. Beasi» hehe good point (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:46am) «I can see the bunny» yes, you definitely qualify as the coolest married couple I know Melinda *g* (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:47am) «Kate Leahy» "wah wah wah, i was just making a turn when it said 'no turn on red.'" (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:47am) «Melinda J. Beasi» aw, thanks leanne! (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:47am) «Paul D. Beasi» http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/04/24/scotus.arrest.03/index.html (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:48am) «Kate Leahy» ooh. scotus. my favorite medieval irish philosopher. um, not. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:48am) «I can see the bunny» heehee - you're welcome (although considering most of the married people I know, I'm not sure how far the compliment goes...) ;) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:48am) «bored, bored, bored....» Hey! Married person here... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:50am) «Melinda J. Beasi» well, i'll keep that in mind. :) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:50am) «bored, bored, bored....» Thanks Chrissie *g* Too bad Bill isn't...heh.... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:51am) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2024 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|