Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«Paul D. Beasi» yes, i do all that and i speed, too (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:21am) «Paul D. Beasi» i break all kinds of laws (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:21am) «bored, bored, bored....» Do tell ;-) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:22am) «Paul D. Beasi» but i don't profit from it (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:22am) «Paul D. Beasi» and any movie i've downloaded i've not only seen more than once, but i've bought on DVD when it came out (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «I can see the bunny» wow - Paul's a rebel ;) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «Paul D. Beasi» and any mp3 i've downloaded, i've bought the CD for (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «Kate Leahy» then that's not technically breaking the law. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «Melinda J. Beasi» i fail to see how breaking laws is hypocritical. unless you claim to believe that those laws are important. it's all about priorities. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «Kate Leahy» as long as you've paid for the material. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «Paul D. Beasi» which is why my wife and i have over 1500 CDs combined (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «Melinda J. Beasi» breaking laws is just crime. as simple as that. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:23am) «bored, bored, bored....» I regularly take 12 items in the 9 items or less line.... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:24am) «Kate Leahy» i rip the tags off mattresses (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:24am) «Paul D. Beasi» if would be hypocritical of me if i was running a campaign against peer to peer file sharing (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:24am) «Paul D. Beasi» but i openly support P2P :) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:24am) «soul groove feline» i sneak into 19+ shows to see frulads perform (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:25am) «bored, bored, bored....» I drink Starbucks coffee!! There, I said it. *whew* I'm glad I got *that* off my chest. ;-) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:25am) «Kate Leahy» there's an argument to be made that if you vote, you're participating in government and therefore it's hypocritical to vote and knowing break laws. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:25am) «Kate Leahy» that's kind of a stretch though. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:25am) «Paul D. Beasi» guess what? i don't vote :) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:26am) «Kate Leahy» ah. then no complaining from you! (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:26am) «Melinda J. Beasi» i think you can participate in government without agreeing with everything that goes on with it. that's, in fact, the point of participating, is it not? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:26am) «Paul D. Beasi» the only person i could honestly vote for is myself, since i'm the only one who believes everything i believe in. since i'm not likely to be running for (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:26am) «Melinda J. Beasi» and i do vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:26am) «Paul D. Beasi» office any time soon, i'm not likely to voting :)( (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:27am) «Kate Leahy» heh. i wish it was against the law to not vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:27am) «Kate Leahy» write yourself in. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:27am) «Kate Leahy» or natural law. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:27am) «Melinda J. Beasi» well i most certainly don't believe in biblical law. so no hypocrisy there. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:27am) «Paul D. Beasi» it absolutely should NOT be against the law to not vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:28am) «Kate Leahy» "biblical law" is a sketchy term. it means two completely different things for jews and christians. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:28am) «Shawna login infrequent» /me invents a law that tired fruheads should got to SLEEP instead of getting addicted to Wall. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:28am) «Shawna login infrequent» :) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:28am) «Kate Leahy» *shrug* it's against the law not to vote in plenty of places. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:28am) «Melinda J. Beasi» no, i believe in my own personal morality. i follow those laws. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:28am) «Paul D. Beasi» well one of those places is not the united states (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Shawna login infrequent» Cuz otherwise tired fruheads start spelling "go" as "got" (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Kate Leahy» paul -- right. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Melinda J. Beasi» i DO vote, and i strongly believe in it, and treasure my right to vote. but i would move somewhere else if it became against the law not to vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «Kate Leahy» hence our dismal voter turnout. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:29am) «I can see the bunny» actually, the basis of criminal justice comes from ancient Greece - but what we have today bears little similarity to how it started off... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Melinda J. Beasi» it is as much of a stand to abstain as it is to vote. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Shawna login infrequent» One insomniac night, I was watching Leno (ugh) and they were asking some random woman if she could identify the photos of some major American politicans... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Paul D. Beasi» if i were forced to vote, i would be forced to show my support for a candidate i did not believe in. or more likely, i'd be voting against the candidate i (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Paul D. Beasi» believed LESS in (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:30am) «Melinda J. Beasi» chrissy, i don't care if my morality often coincides with biblical law. the simple truth is that i would never believe in something just BECAUSE it was (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Melinda J. Beasi» biblical law. i would believe in it if i thought i was right. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Shawna login infrequent» ...she couldn't even indentify Bush. When asked: "Don't you VOTE?" She replied "Oh...I don't know...*fluster fluster* My husband does everything....I dunno..." (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Kate Leahy» well, in belgium it's illegal to not check in at the polls. you don't have to cast a vote for any particular party or individual, for instnace. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Melinda J. Beasi» what do i care if the bible and i agree here and there? it's not relevent. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:31am) «Kate Leahy» the whole issue of biblical law is a little too hot to handle. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Paul D. Beasi» ah, but they aren't forcing you to vote, just to show up. it would be inconvenient, but i wouldn't say i was opposed to that (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Paul D. Beasi» i'd go and then not vote (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Kate Leahy» "thou shalt not murder" only comes one book after a law that says you can kill your daughter for being promiscuous (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Melinda J. Beasi» why? i am not AGAINST the bible, i just simply have no interest in it. what do i care if i agree with it sometimes and sometimes don't? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:33am) «Kate Leahy» yes. i'm using the term "vote" too loosely, i think. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:34am) «I can see the bunny» /me will refrain from giving opinions on the bible....being a recovered Baptist and all... (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:34am) «Paul D. Beasi» agreed, melinda. i don't believe in killing. my support for being anti-kill does not mean i support the bible, since it says "thou shalt not kill" and that's (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Melinda J. Beasi» the whole issue of biblical law has no relevance to people who don't believe in the bible. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Paul D. Beasi» where the law is based. I (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Melinda J. Beasi» if they were doing a "go, bible!" show, actually i probably would not go. because though i have no strong opinion against it as a lovely work of fiction, i als (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:35am) «Melinda J. Beasi» also have no desire to support it in such a complete way. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Paul D. Beasi» i'm TOTALLY missing your point, chrissy (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «bored, bored, bored....» Melinda - I agree. If I had to go to court, I wouldn't swear on the bible, because it would have no meaning whatsoever for me (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Melinda J. Beasi» so, no, i would not give my money to the bible (if you can give your money to an inanimate object). (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Melinda J. Beasi» lisa, i would not either. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:36am) «Paul D. Beasi» if fruvous WERE doing a "go bible" show, i'd at least show up to see that it was actually happening :) but no, i would not attend (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:37am) «Paul D. Beasi» even if it were billed as "their last show ever! really! we mean it!" (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:37am) «Kate Leahy» i don't believe it's required to do the bible thing in court. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:37am) «bored, bored, bored....» I'm sure they let you take a different oath. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Melinda J. Beasi» there is no need to explain. quakers (which i was brought up as) can affirm rather than swear on the bible. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Paul D. Beasi» No, i am not. Laws can be based on anything. I can agree with them and I can disagree with them. Agreeing with a law that has a basis in something that i (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Kate Leahy» i always thought it was a little weird anyway. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Paul D. Beasi» don't believe in 100% means nothing. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Melinda J. Beasi» and i'm sure anyone could. (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Melinda J. Beasi» how so? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Kate Leahy» just curiosity (really) -- do you follow laws with which you agree? (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:38am) «Kate Leahy» er, with which you disagree, rather (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:39am) «Paul D. Beasi» hmmm.. trying to think... i know i've broken laws that i agree with (and yes, i am a hypocrite for it) (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:40am) «Paul D. Beasi» i'm trying to come up with an example of a law i disagree with but follow anyway (Jun 2, 2002 @ 12:40am) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2025 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|