Welcome, guest!
Create an account for a personalized experience,
or log on if you have one.
|
|
|
|
Welcome, guest! | |
Wall Archive | ||||
|
«nate...» ewwww (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:33pm) «nate...» none of the other teams so far have come up with good names..... (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:33pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» heh (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:33pm) «nate...» The Fuhgettaboutits, The Body Bags, etc (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:34pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» But no one ever says "Fuhgettaboutit" on The Sopranos. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:39pm) «renita» see now. there is nothing inherantly icky about weird-ass hair. but move that hyphen and WOAH!!! whole new ballgame. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:42pm) «renita» and hmmm. I guess I should have checked the wall and not depended solely upon the mainpage. *sigh* (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:43pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» heh (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:45pm) «Michael (foof) Maki» Renita and I are apparently sharing a brain today. :-) (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:46pm) «nate...» hehe (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:54pm) «iPauley» *grin* (Oct 10, 2002 @ 12:58pm) «renita» I need it for tomorrow, okay? Psych mid-term :p (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:04pm) «Jºnªthªn» hey there (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:12pm) «nate...» where? (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:14pm) «Jºnªthªn» here (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:15pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» so yeah, how much does this stink-- (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:15pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» WUNH only has ONE fruvous album (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:15pm) «nate...» aww... sucky (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:16pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» YWGTTM (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:16pm) «Jºnªthªn» I bet it's scratched too (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:16pm) «nate...» and has the plague (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:16pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» haha i didn't think to check its condition... (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:17pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» the music director is pretty cool--i can probably add a few other albums (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:17pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» but that would necessitate BUYING them...ugh (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:17pm) «lawrence» ack, and it's not even the best one. well, ok, it could be worse - they could have only one and it could be the C album. :) (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:18pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» i don't really know what's on what album. but ywgttm has a few that i like...and a few sentimental faves from frff--sahara and no no raja (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:20pm) «lawrence» oh, it has great songs on it. it's just... very very dry. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:20pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» dry? (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:20pm) «Mamalissa!» actually, it's one of my fave albums, if only b/c it's what they were touring when I first saw them (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «lawrence» the recordings are weak. not nearly enough reverb in the vocals, so everything is just.... bland. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» yeah--sentiment has a lot to do with "fave albums" (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «John J. Ryan» The Your New Boyfriend tour (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «Mamalissa!» hotmail is being pissy (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» so is this computer in the MUB cluster...ick...i gotta get back to work anyway...see you guys tomorrow! YIPPEEEEE! (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «John J. Ryan» Fruvous comes across SO much better live than on the album (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:21pm) «Mamalissa!» yayeee! see ya tomorrow, Beth! (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:22pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» beth, 2 days to EFO wknd! is FINALLY going to watch the fruconIV(?) video that ellen lent her tonight (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:22pm) «beth-pseudocanuck!» bye guys. *HUGS* (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:22pm) «Mamalissa!» it doesn't have the open mic, does it? (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:22pm) «John J. Ryan» I'd love to see that video myself (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:22pm) «John J. Ryan» John J. Ryan kicks myself for not taking video of Frucon 5 (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:23pm) «renita» hmm. It's a different experience, that's for sure. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:23pm) «John J. Ryan» For best Fruvous recording (Live Noise doesn't count), I would probably have to say Thornhill. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:24pm) «John J. Ryan» In terms of quality recording, not that it is the best album. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:24pm) «John J. Ryan» Wood is a very close 2nd. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:25pm) «lawrence» then bargainville, then b. then ywgttm. then live noise. then all the bootlegs. then all the radio appearances. then C. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:27pm) «John J. Ryan» Hate C much Lawrence? :) (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:29pm) «lawrence» lots and lots. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:30pm) «Mamalissa!» okee. I'm off. My rocker. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:31pm) «Mamalissa!» later, all! (cyber-ly and otherwise) (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:31pm) «John J. Ryan» See you tomorrow Melissa! (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:33pm) «nate...» I would tend to agree.... C=Ick. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:40pm) «Andrea Krause» wow. I am SO messed up. Forever I've been thinking that the 11th was Saturday and since I have to work Saturday I couldn't hit the EFO show. Now I technically can, if there are tickets, though I don't (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:41pm) «Andrea Krause» know if I could convince Paul. :) (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:41pm) «iPauley» I wouldn't say I hate it, but I definitely like the other albums more. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:42pm) «lawrence» yeah, it's pretty horrendous. a few good tracks. but otherwise they ruined some good songs. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:42pm) «nate...» yeah, same here. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:42pm) «nate...» I try to block it out and pretend it doesn't exist. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:43pm) «lawrence» yeah, they should have included live versions of that and Pisco, i think. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:43pm) «lawrence» was that actually his fruhead song or did they just decide to write it independently? (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:44pm) «iPauley» I'll double check the liner notes, but the impression I got was that it was his FruHead song. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:45pm) «lawrence» I mean - that would make sense. there'd be no reason for them to arbitrarily write a song about a fruhead otherwise. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:45pm) «lawrence» heh. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:46pm) «Josh Woodward» why wouldn't they? (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:46pm) «iPauley» "Just one of the Fr�vous tunes written for the die-hardiest atetndies of our 96-97 touring. The hero of this song, Jared, is presently chief logistics expert for a non-aligned off-shore cyber-terrorist group." (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:47pm) «iPauley» that's not what it said. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:47pm) «lawrence» one of them, I think. it's oddly worded. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:47pm) «Josh Woodward» because they wouldn't fit on a CD, and because that wasn't the point of C. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:48pm) «lawrence» the "one of the" applies to both the songs and the people. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:48pm) «Josh Woodward» i think they picked their favorite for the album. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:48pm) «lawrence» yeah. that's true. every band has one where you go "Uh, what where they thinking?" (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:49pm) «Josh Woodward» for one, this isn't really a "fruvous cd" as much as it was a for-the-fans special. and i don't see what's so bad about C, either. i like it a lot. sure it has some weak tracks, but that's *why* it wasn't a real cd. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:49pm) «nate...» yup... I was thinking "what the hell is this crap?" (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:49pm) «iPauley» Josh: yeah, that's true -- this wasn't a label release... (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:50pm) «lawrence» I mean, it is rejected album tracks. (well, and other random stuff) so the intent definitely isn't for it to be a great album. but they could have made it a lot better. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:50pm) «lawrence» b is nice 'cause it's more concise, I think. and almost all the songs are short and acoustic. (Oct 10, 2002 @ 1:51pm) « Previous 100 entries | Next 100 entries »
©1999-2025 ·
Acceptable Use
Website for Creative Commons Music?
|